By: D. H. Williams @ 2:12 PM - EST
On August 25th Alex Jones confronted NEOCON spokesperson Michelle Malkin while they were both covering Recreate 68’s attempt to magically “levitate” the Denver Mint. Alex Jones a staunch American conservative was upset with Michelle Malkin over her promotion of bringing back internment camps reminiscent of NAZI Germany, he approached her and began a robust dialog.
Almost immediately people who are believed to be associated with Malkin began shouting, “Kill Michelle Malkin” in an attempt to frame Alex Jones. Another member of Malkin’s team then attempted to file a false report with a Denver Police officer who wasn’t fooled by the subtrafuge.

Who are these people?

Was this photo taken by Michelle Malkin co-conspirator Jim Hoft?
Can you identify any of these three? Are they employed by Malkin or an affiliated blogger group? If you know who they are please leave a comment or contact us here.
Interestingly these two who where heard yelling “Kill Michelle Malkin” quickly ran over to Alex Jones slinging there arms around him for a quick photo op. Some in the crowd reported they heard the two say they were with Michelle Malkin and saw them leave with her.
Video of the person in the top photo attempting to file a false claim.
Update: August 29, 2008
Recreate 68 provocateur positively identified as the criminal who tried to incite a riot and frame talk show host Alex Jones by yelling, “Kill Michelle Malkin.”

In this photo you can see the criminal speaking at the ‘Shake your money maker event’ promoted by Recreate 68.

In this photo he is giggling just before yelling, “Kill Michelle Malkin.”
Watch the complete video evidence.
Updated: September 3rd @ 2:35 PM - EST
Additional footage of radio show host Alex Jones confronting NeoCon leftist Michelle Malkin.
Updated: September 6th @ 1:04 PM - EST
Inside Edition, a CBS program attempts to smear Alex Jones. It is important to note that Westinghouse/CBS Inc. is run by Frank Carlucci who is also the former Secretary of Defense, Deputy Director of the CIA and Chariman Emeritus of the Carlyle Group.
Email this post






















32 comments ↓
I have no idea who he is but a Big Ugly Liar. No one punched anybody. He shoved the man back that shoved him. Grow up SNITCH. you get what you put out
AWESOME job here.
We will all be looking for them I will repost on my site
Thank you davinita we need to identify these scoundrels.
I don’t know who the guy in green is, nor the dude with the Obama hat.
But I do know the guy in the black t-shirt - on the left of the picture - it’s Alex Jones from prisonplanet.com
He was the one acting like a right brownshirt - chasing after the diminutive woman whilst shouting “Where’s that MONSTER!”
What a threatening bootboy mobster he is.
I’m glad people are condemning such behaviour by Jones as much as by the other clowns you’re trying to implicate - and “identify”.
I can identify them:
progressive, progressive, and progressive.
Nice try, but, y’all should step up and take responsibility for the actions of your own folks, rather then constantly trying to blame conservatives for your violent crazies. Maybe, if you told them to stop it, maybe they would finally act like civilized adults.
Hi William Teach, nice gravatar. Could you tell me what a “progessive” is?
I think it is hilarious that people think they can tell peoples’ politics by what they look like on a video.
Funny sort of “progressive” who goes brownshirting small women shouting “death to malkin” OR “malkin’s a monster”.
Maybe the dudes were provacateurs - which seems wholly likely. Evidently they were of some stripe.
But that shouldn’t detract from the behaviour of Alex Jones himself - nor from the other troofers present. They engaged in reprehensible boot-boy tactics, aggressively chasing after a small woman in a public place - so as to shout and scream in her face……oh yeah - brilliant! Really progressive!
Whoever was there - we ABSOLUTELY KNOW ALEX JONES WAS.
And look at his behaviour?
DISGUSTING. It belies the fascism that surrounds Alex Jones and 911 Troof.
Why doesn’t Alex go chasing after Mike Rivero and his chum Curt Maynard?
Why doesn’t Alex mouth-off at his chum ‘Big’ Jim Tucker for associating with *genuine fascism* - instead of broadcasting and promoting him?
Do you mean the “small woman” who advocate torture and setting up internment camps for American citizens.
Question what is your opinion of Tokyo Rose and Eva Braun?
I don’t have to defend malkin’s POV. I totally disagree with her.
What about Alex Jones’ association with fascism? Why don’t you address that too - else - why your concern about threat of fascism from the likes of Malkin?
AJ has plenty of close connections to self-avowed fascists and racists. Do you deny that?
You must not listen to AJ’s show very often he advocate Constitutional Republicanism. As far as having fascist on his show he has people of all stripes on his show. Its called open debate.
saw the whole thing. the pretend protesters were out making a scene for the media to make real protesters look bad. Malkin and goons show up to do their hit and Alex called her on her many lies.
Simple.
also simple is the spin that followed from Malkin’s right wing PR flacks.
You sidestepped my question.
You say it’s called “open debate”?
But Alex Jones makes extensive use of ‘Big’ Jim Tucker - on his website, his radio shows, in his films. Alex is *NOT* debating ‘Big’ Jim Tucker - he fields him more as supposed expert witness for Alex’s *OWN* point of view.
And who is ‘Big’ Jim Tucker?
He’s formerly of The Spotlight - which was published by Willis Carto, leading light of the racist, holocaust denying, nationalist american far-right. They are now both involved with AmericanFreePress.
Carto is also publisher of Noontide press - responsible for IHR and the Barnes Review - favoured subjects holocaust denial…….
ADL calls Willis Carto “perhaps the most influential professional anti-Semite in the United States.”
They also say
“Since emerging as a right-wing organizer in San Francisco in the early 1950s, he has been associated with nearly every significant far-right movement in the country, from neo-Nazism to militias, segregationism to Holocaust denial. Known for his reclusiveness, he has founded and overseen from behind the scenes an intricate network of bigotry whose outlets have included Liberty and Property, Western Destiny, the Noontide Press, American Mercury, National Youth Alliance, the Institute for Historical Review, the Populist Party and, most notably, Liberty Lobby.”
————-
So what is the difference between Malkin, and Willis Carto? Why does AJ charge after Malkin but works with - nay, EMPLOYS! - Willis Carto’s colleague, Big Jim Tucker?
Likewise with Mike Rivero from WRH. AJ uses him as a weekly guest. Why does AJ tolerate Rivero’s association with, and promotion of the self-avowedly violently racist Curt Maynard? How do Rivero + Maynard escape the least criticism when Alex and co try to justify chasing after the supposed fascist malkin?
How come Alex calls Malkin “a monster” for being a supposed fascist - when he even employs the real thing, and associates with self-avowed fascists?
Curt Maynard says things like “time to cull the nigger herd” - yet Rivero promotes him - even had him as a main guest on his radioshow…….the same broadcaster as Alex Jones - GCN - owned by Ted Anderson, who also owns Midas Resources, who ALSO sponsor Rivero and Alex Jones…….
Pretty incestuous?
So why pick Malkin over Rivero, Maynard, Jim Tucker and Willis Carto?
How come it appears AJ thinks Malkin’s supposed fascism is reprehensible, yet the fascism of AJs own chums is fine? HOW COME?
AJ has Rivero as a weekly guest on his show. They share broadcasters, and sponsors - and audience.
admin here appears to claim AJs ugly treatment of Michelle Malkin was justified because Malkin gives (qualified?) support for internment……etc.
Well, here’s Mike Rivero (M.R.) speaking about “internment” - only for “hackers”, not Islamists, or whatever………
——–
May 17, 2007
I have no problem with the suggestion that hackers are terrorists.
– M. R.
January 06, 2007
If we treated the hackers the way we treated accused enemy combatants, every computer would be safe and secure.
– M. R.
April 13, 2007
Time to waterboard the hackers.
– M. R.
April 29, 2006
Ransom Trojan demands money with menaces
Reports are coming in of a Trojan that demands a ransom from users and threatens to delete data if payment is not made.
ATTENTION HOMELAND SECURITY:
This is, under the USAPATRIOT act, and any reasonable definition of the word, an act of terror.
Please explain to us taxpayers who pay your salary and for those nice offices you sit in why none of you clowns appears to be able to do anything about these hackers? Why aren;t THEY in Gitmo and Abu Ghraib………….
– M. R.
March 13, 2007
India Hackers Indicted for Hijacking Online Brokerage Accounts
–Fry the bastards!
– M. R.
September 18, 2006
……we need to have such severe legal penalties for hacking that no hacker will dare take the chance of being caught.
We have hundreds of innocent people in Guantanamo. Let’s release them and throw the guilty hackers in there.
– M. R.
June 18, 2006
Hackers ……
If anyone SHOULD be in Guantanamo, it’s these bozos.
– M. R.
May 11 2006
Hacker fears wrath of US court as judge urges his extradition
Gary McKinnon believes that he could be sent to Guantanamo Bay and tried by a military tribunal if his extradition goes ahead. He said that he was “practically already hung and quartered” if US government claims that he would face a federal court in Virginia proved correct.
–This is a problem?
– M. R.
May 27 2006
The time has comer to treat hackers as the domestic terrorists that they are, and if the NSA and CIA ever wish to regain their credibility that they can actually DO anything other than peak into our bedroom windows at night, then let’s seem them find these cyber-criminals and deal with them.
I am “hurling the defy” on this one. Let’s see the spook boys quit pretending to be chasing imaginary terrorists and go after some real-world criminals. Let’s see them actually earn those taxpayer dollars they suck up.
Because if they can’t catch some pimply faced smelly kid with a PC, then they are totally useless against a real adversary with the resources of a nation-state.
– M. R.
Jan 31 2007
Okay, I think that we have reached the point where firing squads for hackers are going to be cheaper than all this security crap paid for by millions of computer users.
– M. R.
————————————————
Now - where is the clear principle of difference between what Malkin said, and what Mike RIvero says about hackers?
To justify such a difference between AJs treatment of Malkin, to his treatment of Rivero there must surely be a clear difference of principle?
But what is it? I don’t see any. So, amin - what is the difference in principle between Rivero’s words and Malkin’s? Why does Malkin deserve epithet “fascist” but not Rivero? Why does Malkin deserve hunting - but not Rivero?
Hey J - Write a couple paragraphs of what you saw and I will post it.
Alex Jones was confronting a very nasty political writer who had several large body gaurds with her. It is the hatred that spews from Malkin’s writings that is disgusting.
The provocateurs clearly was working with Malkin to discredit anyone that questioned Malkin.
Alex Jones thank you for showing strength in adversity.
Ask Malkin who they are
malkintemp@gmail.com
Ask Mrs. Elitist herself who they are
malkintemp@gmail.com
Ask her, saying they did a great job, and you would like to contact them for further employment.
Please help locate these people. We need to know who they are. I’ll try my best to find out.
So - silence about the fascism around Alex Jones?
How come?
If you want to “out” fascist provocateurs why not just look through Alex’s backcatalogue? where are all his old guests?
You all know Rivero - he doesn’t even “identifying”? And yet you’re all silent about his saying much the same thing as Malkin?
So these people you are now “hunting” were shouting “Kill Michelle Malkin!”?
OK - reprehensible, I admit.
But Rivero says “Torture Hackers!”
Yet you don’t find it equally reprehensible?
I thought admin suggested Malkin deserved such treatment from Jones, because of her support for internment, and torture etc…….
But Rivero says the same thing, only about hackers - and yet Rivero is an apparently close colleague of Alex Jones!
——
So another question which you’ll probably leave unanswered - what is the difference between Rivero calling for waterboarding of hackers, whom he describes as “terrorists” - and Malkin’s support(?) for it?
As there’s no difference - why is Alex working WITH the one, and brownshirting the other?
Photographer
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=55519.msg274322#msg274322
correct link
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=55992.0
Anti-Fascist, we judge a man by his actions and his words.
Never heard of this Rivero guy, or “Big” Jim Tucker. I could also safely assume that I have listened to his show much longer than you have.
He has repeatedly said that the issue of the New World Order, government corruption, and the dumbing down of the masses is an issue relevant to us all that desire freedom — and that issues of creed, class, and race are only used as a method of divide and conquer to keep human beings in the dark about the methods of control that have ran their lives for centuries and quite possibly millenia.
Freedom is the freedom to disagree am I right?
And what we see now, is part of the memetic mind f&ck of psycho-political warfare in 21st century information warfare.
How far would you go to shut up “troofers”?
Racists?
Internment camps? If anything, I would be afraid of the fact that on both sides, Democrat and Republican, they are both in favor based on their voting records of alienating and limiting free speech, as they have been doing for quite some time.
You are wasting your breath, and I hope you gain some impartiality as far as a sociological and historical perspective of this goes.
http://www.lookingattheleft.com/2008/08/shaking-the-freedom-cage/#comment-55
Pretty sure this is the guy who lied to the cops.
He was a on the street reporter for Malkin on her site and he mentions the incident however removing the lying to cops part.
PLEASE SOMEONE TRACK DOWN THESE 3 PIECES OF FILTH
THEY DESERVE TO SERVE JAIL TIME
WELL DONE ALEX JONES FOR CONFRONTING THE TREACHEROUS DEMON MALKIN
http://www.infowars.com
DONT MESS WITH ALEX JONES OR HIS LEGION OF TRUTHERS
ASK MARK DAVIS
James Lee Watson writes:
“Anti-Fascist, we judge a man by his actions and his words.
Never heard of this Rivero guy, or “Big” Jim Tucker.”
—————
If you don’t know those people then you can’t judge, can you?
And before opening your mouth in judgement on what I said - maybe you should open your eyes, open google, open your mind - BEFORE telling me I’m wrong. That might be wise, don’t you think?
Rivero is tight with AJ - impossible you can not know him, if you really have listened to AJ extensively.
Rivero is a weekly guest! Rivero broadcasts on the same network as AJ - GCN - they share the same sponsors, share the same “cause”, share audience, contributors etc…..
Rivero promotes Curt Maynard - a violent racist fascist. Maynard says think like “time to cull the nigger herd”.
Why is it so wrong for Malkin to be a racist when AJs own friends and colleagues evidently are? How is that?
And there’s an effort to make a false divide here - Alex Jones and Malkin SHARE A LOT OF THE SAME VIEWS.
Malkin supported the Minutemen - she raises LA RAZA - JUST LIKE JONES DOES.
Malkin opposes socialism - in medicine. Alex Jones supported RonPaul who stands for PRIVATISED MEDICINE. Malkin and Jones agree.
Malkin supports homeschooling against state schooling. So does Jones.
Malkin supports privatised services. So does Jones.
There is a whole list of issues over which Malkin and Jones would agree - small government, low taxes, pro-business, capitalist, anti-socialist, pro-privatisation, pro-markets on and on the list goes.
It’s wrong to paint Alex Jones as some sort of ideological opponent of Malkin - they are so much the same.
And if Malkin is a racist/fascist - what does that make Jones? They agree on so much - especially over immigration - how can Malkin be such a “monster” but not Jones?
today prisonplanet says:
“…their jack-booted propagandist Fox News idols like Michelle Malkin.”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/inside-edition-smears-jones-for-malkin-confrontation.html
——————————–
Black is white - up is down - war is peace……….
Alex Jones is the jack-boot. Prisonplanet’s ludicrous SPIN cannot hide it.
PAUL IN ST PAUL
fear neocons fear
nader paul kucinich gravel
mckinney ventura too
perot charts
RATM
You ask IF anyone can identify these people.
But then you say:
“Recreate 68 provocateur…….”
How can you say he’s a ReCreate68 provocateur when you don’t know?
I was not there, NOR am I with Alex Jones. I’d have smacked her and taken the consequences. Michelle Malkin is self-loathing and repugnant beyond words.
Anti-fascist,
I’m afraid you are terribly misinformed, ignorant, and intentionally picking a fight. We here are dedicated to, I for one have sworn an Oath to protect, the Constitution of the People of the United States of America. The Constitution is far from fascist.
Speaking of fascism, what exactly do you not like a fascism? Is it the government redistribution of wealth, or the centrally controlled education? Do you not like that fascist governments are ones which conscript military, practice positive identification of ’subjects’, require everyone labor without pay for the greater glory of the people, operate forced labor prisons, or is it the fact that it actually socialism disguised to confuse morons like you?
Lenin espoused a worldwide united proletariat. Stalin knew that a worker in Moscow would not forsake his supervisor, a man he spent all day with, for the sake of some anonymous worker in Prague. Therefore, he decreed that no one whom did not pledge allegiance to Moscow could be called Communist.
The result? The evil socialist insane asylum centered in Moscow was called communist. The evil socialist insane asylum centered in Berlin was called Fascist.
As time passed, Germany’s evil model evolved a tad more nationalistic in nature while Soviets became fiercely loyal to a ‘Party’.
In conclusion; because I cannot accept that there is still someone so moronically, hopelessly, willfully stupid as you in the world - you must be a spook.
Take your provocations and misinformation elsewhere. You cannot divide this house, devil.
Ass.
How do I change my avatar?
Leave a Comment